The evolution of antievolution policies after kitzmiller v. The courts website with the 9 page opinion pdf file is here. He also ruled that members of dover s school board lied under oath to hide their religious motivations. Aralene barrie callahan, bryan rehm day 2 am 188k pdf.
Aclu of pennsylvania attorney vic walczak discusses the kitzmiller v. It would become an important test for the constitutionality of teaching intelligent design in public schools. There is also a wikipedia article about the case, with a great deal of worthwhile background information. Dover decision is a response to judge jones decision. Dover area school district federal court case involving intelligent design and the book of pandas and people. Bush, made a very strong ruling against intelligent design. It is also called the dover trial, because it happened in dover, pennsylvania. Introduction 1 on october 18, 2004, the dover area school district board of directors passed a. Dover and the ramifications it has for being able to keep intelligent design creationism out of science classrooms. It said that intelligent design was not science, and could not be taught as science in schools. District court for the middle district of pennsylvania, from. Dover area school district policy requiring the teaching of intelligent design. The first judicial test for intelligent design philip a. Dover found that idlike other more explicitly religious alternatives to evolutionmust be excluded from public school classrooms as a violation of the constitutions establishment clause 10,11.
The town of dover population 1800 is located near york, pennsylvania in the southcentral part of the state. Bryan rehm learned of the biology curriculum controversy by virtue of. He ruled that it is creationism and is not science. This file contains additional information such as exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. Documentary on the dover school district trial kitzmiller v. Unlike dover, however, the cobb county board survived to file an appeal, which was being heard by the 11th circuit as jones handed down his opinion. Consistent with earlier cases in other states, the court in kitzmiller v. Will there be fresh lawsuits in the wake of kitzmiller. Dover area school district involved a policy under which students will be made aware of gapsproblems in darwins theory and of other theories of evolution including, but not limited to, intelligent design.
Rutgers journal of law and religion volume 8 fall 2006 kitzmiller v. Jones iiis decision barring dover area school district from mentioning intelligent design in a ninthgrade biology class. This was the first time in america that any schools at any level had specifically promoted intelligent design. Pursuant to the policy, the school district drafted a.
Kitzmiller trial transcripts national center for science. This is the second in a series of short articles discussing the excellently written and superbly reasoned opinion, issued on 20 december 2005, by judge john e. Kodi archive and support file community software vintage. Pursuant to the policy, the school district drafted a disclaimer that teachers were required to read in class prior to teaching evolution. Dover brought before the court the question of teaching intelligent design in schools.
Kitzmiller plaintiffs brief intelligent design is a religious view, not a scientific theory, according to u. Jones iii, who was nominated by president george w. Having read most of the trial transcript, i must conclude that this book is on target. United states district court for the middle district of pennsylvania argued september 26, 2005 november 4, 2005, decided december 20, 2005 full case name. The victors appear ready to turn to state school boards, where proponents of.
In december 2004, the aclupa sued the dover area school district on behalf of eleven parents who objected to the recent policy that required the teaching of intelligent design in biology classes as an alternative to evolution. Darwin in smalltown america is a 2008 book by journalist lauri lebo about the kitzmiller v. Dover area school district,1 the dover school board and the intelligentdesign movement as a whole stood trial on the claim that they were trying to pass off a religious view as though it were a scientific theory, so that they could market it to students in publicschool science classrooms. Dover area school district intelligent design trial, through her own perspective as a local reporter on the trial as she confronted her own attitudes about organized religion and her father who was a fundamentalist christian. They intend for their children to attend dover high school.
The dover area school district required its science teachers to read students a statement in biology class telling them that biological evolution is a theory with gaps for which there is no evidence, and encouraging the students to learn a doctrine called intelligent design as an alternative to the scientific theory of evolution. No excerpts can substitute for the overpowering impression to be gained by reading the entire opinion, which we highly recommend. To preserve the separation of church and state mandated by the establishment clause of the first amendment to the united states constitution, and art. District court for the middle district of pennsylvania is one of the foremost defenders of evolution in public schools, ruling the teaching of intelligent design unconstitutional in public schools in the landmark kitzmiller v. Below are links to complete transcripts of testimony at the kitzmiller v.
This is the decision of the court in the kitzmiller et al. Dover area school district, also known as the dover trial, was a federal law suit brought about by tammy kitzmiller and 10 other plaintiffs against the dover area school district and its board of directors. Dover area schools case with the plaintiffs at the 2006 membership conference the decision is a victory not only for the aclu, who led the legal challenge, but for all who believe it is in appropriate, and unconstitutional, to advance a particular religious belief at the. Kitzmiller vs dover board of education 911 youtube. Kenneth miller day 1 am 174k pdf day 1 pm 222k pdf day 2 92705 am. Jones iii in his historic decision in kitzmiller v.
1239 1495 1420 862 672 1448 1241 30 12 1346 232 825 455 730 867 1180 460 271 1335 334 426 678 1349 984 925 153 352 981 1413 901 37 210 997 296 432 175 1135